Does this mean that you have to do less reading to be effective in Python? ;-)
P.S. I'd be interested to look at a couple of Python books in your library. "Python Web Programming", "Python Standard Library" and "Python Programming on Win32" sound interesting.
Submitted by Uldis Bojars on Sat, 2007-03-17 21:55.
"Does this mean that you have to do less reading to be effective in Python? ;-)"
I believe that would be one of Python's advantages. Since they focus on one way to do it.
A little problem though is if you disagree on the way, and this is why ruby shines. My favourite example is that I can freely mix to have () or not, but I can decide when I want to use what (i use () for method definitions, but i normally do not use () when I call them. I found it to lead to more readable code.)
Does this mean that you have to do less reading to be effective in Python? ;-)
P.S. I'd be interested to look at a couple of Python books in your library. "Python Web Programming", "Python Standard Library" and "Python Programming on Win32" sound interesting.
"Does this mean that you have to do less reading to be effective in Python? ;-)"
I believe that would be one of Python's advantages. Since they focus on one way to do it.
A little problem though is if you disagree on the way, and this is why ruby shines. My favourite example is that I can freely mix to have () or not, but I can decide when I want to use what (i use () for method definitions, but i normally do not use () when I call them. I found it to lead to more readable code.)
Post new comment